Features
Testimonials
Pricing
Community
844-994-7386
Login
Signup
Home
Features
Testimonials
Pricing
Community
Login
Features
Testimonials
Pricing
Community
844-994-7386
Community
Welcome
Q & A
Feature Requests
Bug Reports
Project Showcase
Humor & Memes
Blog
Product Updates
Inside Track
Help Center
Training Videos
Documentation
Jeffery Osborn
Community Profile
All
Posts
Comments
Revison Overlay
5d 22h
Perfect, thanks, so then I can takeoff on the old plan and then move it to the new one. Thanks Again!
Revison Overlay
5d 22h
So it appears this will take a while to implement, I was thinking, about cropping an outdated page as a new page, however, we cannot even crop an outdate page as a new page. Will allowing cropping ...
Viewing takeoff on outdated plans in Reports
6d 22h
No it only shows whats on an active sheet
Viewing takeoff on outdated plans in Reports
6d 22h
Is there a way to view in reports, takeoff that is not on an active sheet?, I have a number of revisions that I am doing on a job, I am using the ...
3 Replies
Revison Overlay
7d 22h
How is this feature request coming along, this is a big item that we need to compare revisions. Thank You
Formula Error
7d 22h
And how do you do these GIF images, I tried and cannot get it to work
Formula Error
7d 22h
Will that work as a formula for a custom property? I have the formula to change in another custom property, Where is that additional info tab? Or is that a custom property?
Formula Error
7d 23h
That wont let me use it to calculate another formula: The yes/no only name option will not work in a formula: So there are 2 thing happening with this one custom property, I am using it for a name ...
Formula Error
6d 0h
if([Separate Neutrals] = "Yes", 4, 3) I have this formula with a custom property I created, its serving 2 purposes, first is to create and add to ...
20 Replies
Takeoff Tree View option
8d 9h
No I dont want to see any of the child ones under that takeoff (measured length) the ones in blue basically
Takeoff Tree View option
7d 23h
Can there be an additional view option to not show the child Takeoff items
3 Replies
Convert to Items
8d 18h
I wanted to a say a batch option, or selecting and right click and say convert to item
Convert to Items
8d 11h
Is there a way to convert takeoff to items? I imported takeoffs from OST, but now to take advantage of the options in ZZ, they need to be converte...
3 Replies
Under Review
Custom Properties
8d 18h
Maybe additional Check box on the custom property page to apply to all selected items, it would default to be a plus sign and remove option like we use for adding measurement types, that custom lis...
Custom Properties
8d 18h
Is there a way to have custom properties only appear on takeoff items that they relate to? When we create an item, maybe there can be an option to...
3 Replies
Under Review
Formula Bug?
8d 19h
I have it fixed now, I was confusing myself I divded 6 into 6... thats 1, instead of 6 into 4. Thanks
Formula Bug?
8d 19h
Looks like this wont allow a decimal value
Formula Bug?
8d 19h
([./# of CCTs/point count]/[CCTs per HR]) I did this and it return 1
Formula Bug?
8d 19h
Should be 1.5
Formula Bug?
8d 19h
This part of the formula is returning a 0 ([./# of CCTs]/[CCTs per HR])
Formula Bug?
8d 19h
Sorry there still is a slight issue: If I do the math on this: 42.10+20 = 62.1#of CCTs = 6CCTs per HR = 4 6/4=1.5 62.1 * 1.5 = 93.15, this then should round this up to 100, I even took out the if t...
Formula Bug?
8d 19h
I had to add ./ for the # of CCTs, then this works: if([./# of CCTs/qty] < [CCTs per HR],(sum('qty')+[Linear:FT]),((sum('qty')+[Linear:FT]))*([./# of CCTs/qty]/[CCTs per HR]))
Formula Bug?
8d 19h
Not sure if I have this formula incorrect or there is a bug, I do the math manually and I should get 260 In simple terms, my total conduit len...
9 Replies
Closed
Child Names from Parts of Parent Name
8d 23h
The custom properties work great. Thanks
Linear takeoff rounded
8d 22h
So I set my item to round to nearest 1, but the sub takeoff items dont round, these only show up on the report: Is there a way to have t...
2 Replies
Under Review
Next