Well, I'll be...... Thanks @Lorin. I couldn't find the Section Name in the columns. I needed to add that to my custom properties. It works now.

What would make it easier (in my brain) and easier for all users, is to have "snap" points on both sides of the line. See this feature request. It would then function as the area merge tool does.

That could be useful. I was originally thinking to select the object that I want to mirror, enter the dimension as we do for offset, and hit "ok". In the video, tie-ins will require manual "tweakin...

I have 05 bldgs that I named in the section properties. I did that as I need breakouts for each, and was hoping I could pull a report........ I'll wait patiently.

The offset function sort of works.....

Team, giving this one a bump as I am struggling through a large project, and this would speed all of us up substantially.......

Some of these have been discussed in other posts above, and also in other questions/requests, but here are the highlights.Vectorizing and AutotraceI want to clarify that while it may be people usin...

A User/company setting would be great.

@Edinsa, I have found that whatever the order of the items is in my custom properties, is how they display in the item properties. Give rearranging on the "backend" a whirl and see if that helps. T...

Team, IF you are like me and have been looking for a solution here, but didn't quite understand the process. I want to lay it out step by step. 1. Go to Custom Properties2. Open the Property (Grey ...

I tried another spot, and it merged the areas, but then removed the arc points in both the areas and the cutouts.

It is dang close..... The majority of the areas worked, but I had one instance where it "filled" an area that it shouldn't have.

@David, Here is a discussion on stitching.

Does grouping by Layer first not work for you?

@Fred, I gave this a whirl again today. It is working for me when I use the array command from the "Spacebar" menu. Also, one of my estimators told me to just use the "arrow" key. I don't know why ...

@Fred, I was able to use the "minus" key to make this happen.....

I was thinking about this one today. Now and then, I get a CADD file. I import these into AGTEK or TBC to get my earthwork takeoffs. The thought is this...... If we could import the CADD file, use ...

Polylines for the win! Sometimes the "breaks" are all sorts of directions.

@Stephen, Thank you. Also, see this link to a bug report where I can select some things and not others after typing......

Trust is an amazing thing. People want to be trusted, respected, and valued. People are amazing, and we are all better when we work as a team.

I’ll check it out the next time I need to bring one in. Thanks!

Not a problem. I will send you a link to the job in Dropbox.

I understand the difference between the views. For the count item shown, why does it display as a count item on the page view, but it is part of the linear item on the takeoff side? I'm guessing be...

I like the grouping, so for me, a checkbox to say yes or no would be ideal.

I agree. I like to build my takeoffs, templates, and assemblies all in order of operation of how they get "built". It helps me keep it all straight and ensures that I have captured everything.