Well, Done Miquel! You’ve got a clean setup there.Both approaches get to the same result, I hope. It just comes down to what suits the workflow better. Personally, I feel more comfortable with my a...

Okay amigo, espero que esto ayude!You may have to change my temperatures on this formula if you can get a better info.This is a starter list with Tier 1 Cities. Then Tier 2 Cities like: City Boston...

Disregard the *1, *2 and so on. Change the number after the City to suit your Climate zone and put 1 into the Variables for that CityCopy and paste this and let me know.([City Miami]*1)+([City Hous...

I'm 100% sure that formula will not work. Is it working?

is that the full screenshot of the formula? Are you able to put the full screen if not

okay, I'm not sure then but you can trick it a bit and say have 7.001 and on the other one has (7)

Hi MiquelYou’re on the right track; you just need to follow the Value & Name structure. In your example, it’s currently set up the other way around.

Hi Heber,It would be best if both options were available.Keep beams/joists grouped by each area object for clear takeoff review and verification but also allow a totalled view for overall quantitie...

A checkbox would be awesome, cheers!

@Heber,Thank you so much for the explanation.

Wrong Subject for my Question. I've tried to do sum('Cost Each') and it is not working for me

As always, good question @Kyle! I’ve been working through the same thing. Still not sure if this answers your questions, I'm on my second drink :), still holydaying. One way I see it is to separate...

Hi @Kyle,Not using it yet, still working out how it fits into a real estimating workflow. If SKU is meant to standardise products and drive quantities & pricing consistently across jobs, I can see ...

That's a good news Kyle, thanks mate.

Hi @Heber,This request is now 229 days old and remains a critical workflow requirement for many of us. The current workarounds add significant manual effort and introduce risk of inconsistent prici...

@Kyle,100% agree with you mate

Hi Sam,Firstly, I’d like to say I really appreciate all the ongoing improvements being made to zzTakeoff, it’s clear a lot of effort is going into making it a powerful estimating tool. Similar as @...

@Stephen,Yes, it is under Qty, other ways it will come up with 2 decimal places.Concrete Edge Beam (EB) - [Linear]m L x [Width]m W x [Depth]0m D, Reinforced (3-TM12 Cage), Pumped.

Hi KevinI've learned this yesterday from Stephen. You need to change the units inside the Unit Box from EA to nr.First, change the Parent to Item. In the top right, click on the three-square blocks...

Hi Stephen,Thank you so much, that works for me to.Now we just need it to display the same value in the Name, Text with Tag as well. At the moment, it’s still showing 58.389 m instead of the rounde...

Hi Kevin,Try this formula([Segment count]*2)+if([Linear:m]<=2.4,0,floor([Linear:m]/2.4)-1) The formula counts 2 ends per segment, then adds the number of joints required based on 2.4m board lengths...

Hi Sam,Thanks again, good stuff, the round-up is working well following your instructions.The only issue I’m running into now is with the UOM. When I to enable the rounding, the unit switches from...