If you group by usage and sort by usage, it will sort alphabetically. If you are not sorting by anything, it should be sorted in the same order as the takeoff sidebar order.

I would recommend using "Text With Tags" Mode. The formula mode tries to evaluate your formula as if it were a math expression - '1 + 1', etc. Whereas the text with tag mode replaces any [tags] w...

Hey Fernando, I believe the cost types are always in the following order for reports that group by cost type (unless you reverse the sort):MaterialLaborEquipmentSubcontractOther There is no way to ...

Hey Eliseo, we have a video (a little outdated now) that explains how to set up a custom property and some of the uses. The main difference between this video and what we have right now is that ins...

Thanks for the feature requests! As a workaround for the Auto Show Count Takeoff Labels, if you use templates, you can make the label automatically show by using the Default Label Settings. We do...

Now this is cool! Thank you for the feature requests, Kevin. We'll have to look into this!

Hey @Steve, Arc points are not allowed for segments because we require 3 points for an arc, and segments only have 2 points. In this case, you will have to use a linear instead of a segment.

Hey Justin, you should be able to pull a report right now based on the WBS of your section properties - this limitation is specific to the takeoff sidebar. Here is a video that Todd made about the ...

Thanks for the feature request, Doug! Great examples, and screenshots! This is an area a lot of people have been asking about, so it's working its way up the list.

Hey Steve, thanks for the feature requests! We'll discuss internally on adding these 🙂

Great idea, Perry! I'll mention this to the team 🙂

Hey Perry! Thank you for the feature requests. A lot of these should be able to be done with our current reports. 1. You can right-click on a takeoff row in the reports tab and select "Properties...

Hey Justin - I replied to your other post about the slice area with arc points. Similar situation here, where we converted the arc points into normal points due to the complexity of merging/slicin...

Hmm. This one is a little tricky to do. It could be possible, it's just a matter of making so when the line merges, the line is still a line and not a zig-zag because the points are out of order....

Thanks for the feature request! Are you thinking you would choose a section to mirror, then a section to mirror across? Glad you have somewhat of a workaround in the meantime. 🙂

Hey David, we've discussed this internally, and we are considering adding that ability. The main holdback for us is if you change the wall height per section, what wall height is shown in the repo...

Thanks for reporting, Justin. I think this was done because of the complexity of slicing, and or merging arc points. We'll dig into this to see if we can get a solution.

Thanks for reporting, David! We'll look into this. 🙂

@Isaac is correct. Bluebeam currently re-renders the PDF as you zoom and pan, while zzTakeoff renders the PDF file to an image, so it is super fast to pan/zoom. We have some features we are testi...

@Dylan, here is a video that Todd made showing how to set up section properties & report on those properties - Sections and Custom Properties. We also have a Reports Bootcamp video on how to set up...

Hey Levi, thanks for reporting, does this happen with a specific project, or specific area that you cut out of, or does it happen all the time?

I guess its all about preference/how you set up your formulas, WBS, and reports. Some users may want the cutouts to show and others don't.

@Dustin, we don't have a dedicated forum/marketplace, but anyone who is a freelance takeoff specialist can reply here with their contact info if you want to reach out to them.

@Tyler, in my example below, are you trying to copy the cutout from the right area and paste it onto the left area? If so, we currently don't have a way of doing that, but it could be pretty power...

This one is a little tricky. Technically that row is a section/item combination, and the cost each is pulled from the item. If the cost each was stored at the section, it could mean that you want...